Compensation As Remedy For Justice

Abstract

                Compensation as a legal remedy aims to make the victim whole again by providing monetary relief for the losses suffered. This comparative study analyzes the principles governing compensation under tort law in India, the United Kingdom, and the United States. This research examines the theoretical justifications for compensation, its scope and limitations, the assessment of damage, and its effectiveness in providing meaningful redressal to victims. This paper argues that despite differences in approach, compensation serves the twin goals of corrective justice and deterrence across jurisdictions. However, the lack of uniform principles leads to uncertainty and inconsistency in awarding compensation. This cross-country analysis offers useful insights to guide law and policy reform on this issue.