Evaluating the Healing of Peri-Implant Tissue after Flapless Implant Surgery

Main Article Content

Dr. T.Rachita, Dr. Sushil Kumar Sahoo, Dr. Nch. Ramya Sri Lakshmi, Dr. Manu Gupta, Dr. Srishty Goyal, Dr. Nirvi Sharma

Abstract

Background
Flapless implant surgery is a minimally invasive technique aimed at reducing patient morbidity, promoting faster healing, and preserving peri-implant soft and hard tissues. The healing process of peri-implant tissue following flapless surgery is critical to long-term implant success. This study aims to evaluate the healing process and tissue response after flapless implant surgery.


Materials and Methods


A total of 60 patients requiring single dental implants were selected for this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (flapless implant surgery, 30 patients) and Group B (traditional flap surgery, 30 patients). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was used to assess bone density and tissue healing. Clinical parameters such as implant stability, peri-implant soft tissue healing, and probing depth were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-surgery. Arbitrary values for tissue healing were assigned using a 0-5 scale, where 0 indicates no healing and 5 represents complete healing.


Results
At 2 weeks post-surgery, Group A showed an average healing score of 3.2, whereas Group B had a score of 2.5. By 6 weeks, Group A’s healing improved to 4.0, compared to 3.5 in Group B. At 12 weeks, Group A reached a healing score of 4.8, while Group B achieved 4.2. Implant stability, measured via resonance frequency analysis (RFA), was significantly higher in Group A at all time intervals. Peri-implant probing depths were shallower in Group A compared to Group B, with a mean depth of 2.0 mm versus 2.6 mm at the 12-week follow-up.


Conclusion
Flapless implant surgery demonstrated superior peri-implant tissue healing and implant stability compared to traditional flap surgery. Patients undergoing flapless surgery experienced faster soft tissue healing and less post-operative discomfort. This technique can be considered a viable option for suitable candidates, contributing to improved clinical outcomes.

Article Details

Section
Articles